Original Article Cases of fracture both bone forearm fracture

Both bones forearm fixation by LC-DCP

Authors

  • Karthika Hathwar K.S. Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centres, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Abhishek Raikar Department of Orthopaedics, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru

Keywords:

Forearm fracture, LC-DCP, DCP

Abstract

Background: The forearm is a crucial component of the upper limb’s anatomy because it enables the hand, the upper limb’s
effector organ, to carry out multiaxial everyday activities. Poor functional outcome, non-union, and rotational deformity follow
conservative reduction of fracture BBFA. Hence, keeping the rotation in place requires precise reduction (supination and pronation).
Limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) is used by ORIF to do this. LC-DCP is a revolutionary method of fixing
plates that reduces bone trauma, preserves blood flow, prevents stress raisers caused by implant removal, and promotes faster
healing. To determine the benefits and drawbacks of LCDCP treatment for BBFA diaphyseal fractures, this study is being conducted.
Materials and Methods: After getting their permission, patients who were admitted to the Vijayanagara Institute of Medical Sciences
in Ballari were taken for research. This study, which will run from December 2017 to April 2019, is prospective. Results: This study
includes 40 BBFA fracture instances. All casings were internally fixed with 3.5 mm LCDCP and publicly decreased. Age ranged
from 18 to 60 years, with the second and third decades seeing the highest prevalence of fractures (Average 41). O of 40 patients,
30 patients (or 75% of them) were men and 10 patients (or 25%) were women. Left side affected 24 patients (60%) and right side
affected 16 patients (40%). Injury mechanism 20 RTA (50%) and 16 (40%) with 4 (10%) assaults. 4 (10%) patients had delayed
union, while 36 (90%) patients achieved good union in <6 months. Anderson’s scoring methodology was used to assess the results.
With this rating system, 32 (80%) of our patients had great outcomes. Three patients (7.5%) had an unsatisfactory outcome, while
five (12.5%) patients had one (radioulnar synostosis). infection on the surface 5 (10%) damaged posterior interosseous nerve 2 (5%)
(5% radioulnar synostosis). Conclusion: By promoting biological, rigid fixation and early bone union with excellent radiological
and functional outcomes in the majority of patients, LC-DCP has been found to be superior to other modes of treatment. It can be
regarded as the best implant for fracture fixation of closed both bone diaphyseal fracture forearm in adults.

Author Biography

Abhishek Raikar, Department of Orthopaedics, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru

 

 

References

Morgan WJ, Breen TF. Complex fractures of the forearm.

Hand Clin 1994;10:375-90.

Leung F, Chow SP. A prospective, randomized trial comparing

the LC-DCP with the point contact fixator for forearm fractures.

J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2343-8.

Perren SM. The concept of biological plating using the limited

contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Scientific

background, design and application. Injury 1991;22 Suppl 1:1-41.

Andrew HC. Fractures of shoulder girdle arm and forearm. In:

Canale E, Tery S, editors. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics.

Ch. 49. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 2336-53.

Anderson LD, Sisk D, Tooms RE, Park WI 3rd. Compressionplate

fixation in acute diaphyseal fractures of the radius and

ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:287-97.

Knight RA, Purvis GD. Fractures of both bones of the forearm

in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949;31:755-64.

Burwell HN, Charnley AD. Treatment of forearm fractures in

adults with particular reference to plate fixation. J Bone Joint

Surg Br 1964;46:404-24.

Dodge HS, Cady GW. Treatment of fractures of the radius and ulna

with compression plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54:1167-76.

Moed BR, Kellam JF, Foster RJ, Tile M, Hansen ST Jr.

Immediate internal fixation of open fractures of the diaphysis

of forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:1008-17.

Chapman MW, Gordon JE, Zissimos AG. Compression-plate

fixation of acute fractures of the diaphyses of the radius and

ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:159-69.

Schemitsch EH, Richards RR. The effect of malunion on

functional outcome after plate fixation of fractures of both bones

of forearm in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1068-78.

Teipner WA, Mast JW. Internal fixation of forearm diaphyseal

fractures: Double plating plating versus single compression

(tension band) plating--a comparative study. Orthop Clin N

Am 1980;11:381-91.

Grace TG, Eversmann WW Jr. Forearm fractures: Treatment

treated by rigid fixation with early motion. J Bone Joint Surg

Am 1980;62:433-8.

Smith JE. Internal Fixation in the treatment of fractures of

the shaft of radius and ulna in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br

;41:122-31.

Sarmiento A, Cooper JS, Sinclair WF. Forearm fractures.

J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:297-304.

McKee MD, Seiler JG, Jupiter JB. The application of the limited

contact dynamic compression plate in the upper extremity: An

analysis of 114 consecutive cases. Injury 1995;26:661-6.

Published

12-07-2023

How to Cite

Hathwar K.S., K. ., & Raikar, A. (2023). Original Article Cases of fracture both bone forearm fracture: Both bones forearm fixation by LC-DCP. Journal of Bones &Amp; Muscles Health, 1(2), 50–60. Retrieved from https://portal.jbmh.in/index.php/ins/article/view/33

Issue

Section

Original Article